lumineaux: AlysBear (Default)
[personal profile] lumineaux
I wasn't planning to go see Robin Hood anyway, and this just sort of confirms it:

"As it crashes and bellows toward its sanguinary end, “Robin Hood” makes a hash of the historical record, and also of its own hero’s biography, the truth of which is revealed through a series of preposterous and unsatisfying flashbacks."
http://movies.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/movies/14robin.html


"I'm not exactly sure on what grounds I plan to stand up for Ridley Scott's Robin Hood (Universal Pictures). Nowhere near as terrible as it could have been? Reasonably successful given the grievous miscasting at its core?"  http://www.slate.com/id/2253824/

From the same review:  "The movie eschews every value we've come to think of as quintessentially Robin Hood-ish: derring-do, mischief, laughter, joy."


And, from the redoubtable Roger Ebert,
"Little by little, title by title, innocence and joy is being drained out of the movies. . . . 'Robin Hood' is a high-tech and well made violent action picture using the name of Robin Hood for no better reason than that it’s an established brand not protected by copyright. I cannot discover any sincere interest on the part of Scott, Crowe or the writer Brian Helgeland in any previous version of Robin Hood. Their Robin is another weary retread of the muscular macho slaughterers who with interchangeable names stand at the center of one overwrought bloodbath after another.    Have we grown weary of the delightful aspects of the Robin Hood legend? Is witty dialogue no longer permitted? Are Robin and Marion no longer allowed to engage in a spirited flirtation? Must their relationship seem like high-level sexual negotiations? How many people need to be covered in boiling oil for Robin Hood’s story to be told these days?"
 http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100512/REVIEWS/100519992


Date: 2010-05-14 01:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughingzombie.livejournal.com
This is what happens when you have a director who is respected by movie investors (studios? don't make me laugh), and put the "Let's make a movie" magnet set on his refrigerator. I refer back to the discussions of "Sherlock Holmes", "Star Trek", "Starship Troopers", blah, blah, blah, blah, blah....

Date: 2010-05-14 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] msmemory.livejournal.com
I was hoping for something more than "The Gladiator of Nottingham," dammit.

Date: 2010-05-14 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughingzombie.livejournal.com
Then again, maybe this movie *had* to be made to counterbalance "Men In Tights"...

Date: 2010-05-15 02:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rlg.livejournal.com
hey!
At least "Men in Tights" had a kick line.

Date: 2010-05-15 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laughingzombie.livejournal.com
::snort-chuckle::

I think I just realized what it means to "chortle"!

Date: 2010-05-15 12:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dimityhubbub.livejournal.com
And I'm soooo tired of Cate Blanchette.

Date: 2010-05-15 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ldy-susanna1.livejournal.com
Sorry - love me some Cate Blanchett and Russell Crowe! Looking forward to seeing it , if just for the hair and costuming alone.

Zsu ,
the hair and costume geek.

Profile

lumineaux: AlysBear (Default)
lumineaux

April 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678910 11
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 09:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios