Testing the opinion pool
Jul. 22nd, 2011 02:56 pm
So, I have a guy who wants a Russian name. I pointed him at Wickenden's Dictionary and let him do his own leg work. Here's what he came up with:
Dalek Bolotnikov
Both perfectly period names; within 100 years of each other per Wickenden.
However . . .
This is an informal poll to see if anyone has a trouble with this perfectly good period Russian name harshing his or her medieval mellow, as it were. Does this drag you inevitably back into the modern day?
no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 08:13 pm (UTC)Names originating from Tolkien haven't been registerable for at least 15+ years.
People in period actually did name their kids after characters from the King Arthur legend -- the English and French records are full of Lancelots -- so those names are registerable under an entirely different logic.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 07:57 pm (UTC)If he's not, I'd warn him to test the name out before registering it. I don't find it intrinsically jarring, but if it were my name I think I might get tired of people shouting EXTERMINATE! at me.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-22 11:32 pm (UTC)I can just imagine the shouts of "Exterminate!" when lay on is called.
(This doesn't mean he shouldn't do it, just that he should know that it's going to happen)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 02:22 am (UTC)I'm against it, because there is a false logic that says "if it is documented it is OK". Does he know that some people (who feel this is obtrusive modernity, no matter how ruled) will dislike the name? Can he deal with the exacerbation of the "fun v authenticist" divide from the varying reactions?
Even if one plays a truly authentic game, it is done within a modern context. Does he really need to have a name that is going to highlight that absurdity every time it is said?
no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 02:26 am (UTC)It's documented and awesome and all, but wooooooooooow.
Wow.
I think the recommendation of him playground testing it is a good one. If he can handle whatever amount of jokes occur, well, cool beans on him and paperwork away.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 10:22 am (UTC)So long as the rest of the name doesn't have references to doctors, whos, or extermination, I don't find it obtrusive, and I'm a big Who fan.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-23 05:25 pm (UTC)Terminate!
TERMINATE!!!!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-25 04:01 am (UTC)